I'm taking a wizard lord as my general, and my comp score is trashed because of it. Oddly enough, I'd actually get a better score if i replaced him with with an AL on a war altar...
I think you must be calculating wrong. The AL on War Altar is worth 3 power dice and a penalty of -200.
Ah, you may be right. I guess the war altar counts as a bound item? so an extra die? If so, I missed that. That changes things a bit, but not much. If i have a lev. 2 wiz and a priest (which i do) i have 5PD 4DD before adding a lord. (6 PD with a bound item). Now look at each of the lord choices:
AL on altar: 8PD, 6DD:
-650 (with bound item and 9PD:
-850) (with VHS:
-1050/
-1250)
wizard lord: 9PD, 6DD:
-650 (with bound item and 10PD:
-900) (with VHS:
-850/
-1100)
grand master: 5PD, 4DD:
-50 (with bound item and 6PD:
-100)
general: 5PD, 4DD :
+150 (with bound item and 6PD:
+100)
A wizard lord is likely to have VHS too. Giving it to both, they're still pretty close. Either way, is a wizard lord in the same league as a AL on the altar? I actually thought i was nerfing my army quite a bit by using the wizard lord. However....
The penalty for a bloodthirster is -800, a star dragon is -1200, all the other dragons are -600 to -1000.
Unless i screwed up again, it's costing me between -600 and -1200 to take a Ld 8 wizard lord instead of a Ld 9 grand master or general who are probably going to be more useful and likely cheaper in points as well. Are those extra 4 PD/ 2DD really that unbalancing?
Ph34R the empire wizards !!!!!1!1oneIt seems a bit askew. That's not my only problem with the system. The whole thing seems badly flawed.
But like i said, i'm a bit biased. That's why i'm asking the questions in my original post.